Pick Your Poison Conservatives!: The Catch-22 of Black Lives Matter and Pivoting of the Left Explain
- Andrew John Yanik

- Jun 13, 2020
- 6 min read
Updated: Jun 15, 2020
The endorsement of Black Lives Matter of Democratic Politicians allows BLM to put Republicans in a never before seen bind in name alone. “Black Live Matter” has proven in the way that they choose to funnel thousands of dollars to Democratic candidates and operates that Black Lives Matter intentionally creates a false premise for Republicans conservative moderates. There is a clear choice to be made in the minds of black lives matter leadership because of this open campaign finance: either you support them as a Democratic or liberal institution or you choose to remain a Republican, you implicitly say to the public that you do not believe in “Black Lives Matter ''. The incredible nature of this false premise is that it is not only is this a false premise between two options that are both poor choices for conservatives; it is thus a Catch-22 as well. Even in the most simple of senses, the fact that the “Black Lives Matter website” finishes with a “.com'' means that they are set up for the profit of Democratic politicians, activists, journalists, and the general spread of a Democratic agenda; regardless of whether any individual believes at face value that “Black Lives Matter” as I believe without perhaps clear statistical evidence to state the claim that all but a very small number of Americans believe that Black Lives do not Matter. The avenue to to believe THAT "black lives matter" without supporting the movement Black Lives Matter has to be reestablished and the forced combination of these two has led to more partisan separation, hatred, and even violence on both sides that must come to an end if one day we as Americans hope to regain our country and unite our people under its flag.
Here are some of the more surprising statistics exposed by conservative activists such as Candace Owens and Brandon Tatum:
Bernie Sanders: 186,780,034
Biden for President: 119,253,857
Elizabeth Warren Presidential Expenditure Committee: 93,478, 053
Pete for America: 78,100,960
Democratic Congressional Campaign: 55,684,603
Amy for America: 43,167,720
Friends of Andrew Yang: 31,705,527
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee: 31,067,413
Democratic National Committee: 29,924,707
Amy McGrath for Senate: 29,558,536
As a conservative and being a part of the community at large; I understand how often we cringe and feel ourselves become “triggered” by the notions of institutional racism or systematic racism and for the sake of this discussion we must refer to the definitions of both of these phrases in order to examine them; and the conclusion may surprise many actually. Oftentimes we take the notion of institutional racism as attacks on the nation and ourselves because we are Americans, but when we note wh holds power we must not look at ourselves but our neighbors; especially the policy they have put forth. We must quite literally put down our guns and quit our automatically defensive nature to really understand what is going on; to not own all of American history and its policy that more often than not we have actually had very little role in passing. Democrat and liberal politicians are a part of the institution and we see one of the greatest examples of this we can see directly in front of us. Joe Biden had a major role in creating the 1994 Crime Bill. What this bill did to largely affect communities of color more greatly was incentivises prisons to make their prisoners serve at least 85% of their sentences as well as implement the 3 strikes rule in regards to drug related crimes; meaning that if an individual was arrested and charged on three separate occasions; they would serve a life sentence without parole.
As we understand the leftist narrative that prisons are the equivalent of modern day slavery and even some radicals going as far to say that they should be abolished all together, this begs the question: why elect someone who represents exactly what you sought to destroy? These are the same Democrats calling to de-fund the police who managed to guarantee the jobs of police officers; in fact contributing enough funds to help aid 100,000 of them. The last and greatest kicker in all of this of course was the fact that the federal government under the support of Joe Biden and the Clinton administration, provided 12 billion dollars to states to increase the number of prisons and make sure that the prisons served out 85% of their sentences.
Joe’s justification as always is nothing short of lackluster and borderline incoherent in some cases. In a June 2019 Town Hall Joe looked to justify the ratification of the bill by stating that “In 1994 we had a giant epidemic of violence particularly in the black community. Wow Joe really? Only in 1994 was this a problem? Then why is it that you can now turn around to sympathize with the violence of the rioters, looters, and criminals in the black community today? It was not as though racism was not a problem in 1994 was it not? It was not as though the number of police shootings was any lower among black people then was it not?
This pivot of course is nothing short of incredible and it of course demonstrates exactly why a direct democracy was and is still never possible in this country. Joe Biden obligates himself to pander to his voters, run his apology tours, and occasionally forget his name along the way, but don’t worry! He’s just “Biden” this time. Of course this has really come with little to no solutions and this is where the Republican party has a major opportunity: to provide rational solutions including the likes of abolishing police unions and ending qualified immunity and stopping ourselves from saying that there is nothing for us to fix at all. If we are to continue to deny the existence of endemic issues in our police force, we will instead be forced to deal with more radical, irrational solutions the far left has to offer like abolishing the police and prisons alike.
As the base of the democratic party has shifted as far left as it has; Joe Biden shifting his stances on even bills he helped pass should come as a surprise to no one. If this does not disappoint you on its face then look to his own explanations of his own actions. The reason why this provides a great opportunity for the right is that Biden helps make them so obvious as it appears his mental health and social awareness deteriorates. Besides the most shocking highlight of his interview with Charlemagne stating that “if you have trouble picking between me or Trump you ain’t black!” was really Biden’s justification for the 1994 Crime Bill. Verbatim, Biden states as follows: “People wanna talk about the 1994 Crime Bill. The Crime Bill didn’t increase mass incarceration, other things increased mass incarceration. And the reason why is that you had the vast majority of the black caucus supporting the bill at the time.” Not a soul in the DNC comes forward to denounce how Biden pivoted to avoid the effect of his bill by reasserting blame onto blacks themselves. It is incredible to see this not make headlines from an objective standard but never surprising in the very subjective world we now live in. Once again increasing the validity of the controversial article “Stay Alive, Joe Biden” written by Alex Wagner just half a month ago as a growing and very real feeling of Democratic leaders and their more die-hard constituents.
To tack onto this again in the same damning interview, Biden states in one breath during his interview with Charlemagne that “My city was the only city occupied for 10 months by the national guard after Martin Luther King was shot” but then just today June 12th 2020 goes on to say in an interview pandering to protesters that “Dr Kings assassination did not have the worldwide impact that George Floyd’s death did” only 17 days after Floyd was tragically murdered by Derrick Chaven, the now former Minneapolis police officer.
I feel as though I can do this all day honestly; as many of us know Biden is now a gaf machine; not only in words but in policy as well. He is only even electable to many because of their deep hatred for Trump as nothing about his candidacy offers any real potential for change. Yet we continue to march forward with Biden vs. Trump being the race we never wanted in November. It is on this note that I finish this editorial one final thought: it is only the unconditional hatred of President Trump and even sometimes our own unconditional love that has allowed for this to have reached the tragic climax that it has and with that I beg a question of you all. What would President Donald Trump have to do to make you vote for him? If you do support the President, then what would President Trump have to do to lose your vote? If you cannot answer these questions, you serve as a testament for exactly why I wrote this all together.
Follow my Instagram handle for more content and to make content suggestions! @andre_jyy or email me: andrewyanik@optonline.net




Comments